Showing posts with label Dharma. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dharma. Show all posts

Tuesday, 19 May 2026

Draupadi, Dharma and Freedom

When the nations of the earth were sent forth one after the other, a special word was given by God to each, the word which each was to say to the world, the peculiar word from the Eternal which each one was to speak.To Egypt in old days, the word was Religion; to Persia the word was Purity; to Chaldea the word was Science; to Greece the word was Beauty; to Rome the word was Law; and to India, the eldest-born of His children, to India He gave a word that summed up the whole in one, the word Dharma. That is the word of India to the world. – Annie Beasant


 

In the Mahabharata, there is a prasanga of Draupadi Vastaharan mentioned in the Sabha Parva.

Often readers/viewers look Draupadi with the eyes of sympathy,bechari which is not but abusing her I believe,it is nothing short of disrespecting her. She was persona dignified and had immense self esteem.It's a complete myth that Draupadi was a victim, she was the Kshatrani, and a ball of fire.


During the infamous game of dice, when she was dragged into the assembly hall, she did not merely weep; she cross-examined the greatest elders of the Kuru dynasty—Bhishma, Drona, and Dhritarashtra—on the precise legal and moral definitions of Dharma. Her inherent duty was to speak truth to power and refuse to let Adharma (unrighteousness) go unchallenged.

Draupadi’s interrogation of the court can be broken down into these specific points:

Draupadi’s main question, which silenced the hall of kings and scholars, was:

The Central Legal Question

​"Whom did you lose first, yourself or me?"

​She argued that if Yudhishthira had already gambled and lost himself, he was no longer a free man. As a slave, he would have no legal right to stake another person—specifically his wife—because he no longer "owned" his own personhood or property.

The Morality of the Game: She questioned whether a game of dice, fueled by deceit (Shakuni’s trickery) and intoxication of the ego, could ever result in a legally binding "win." 

The Silence of the Elders: She directly addressed Bhishma, Drona, and Vidura, asking: "Where is the Dharma of the Kshatriyas? Where is the righteousness of the ancestors?" She forced them to confront the fact that their silence was a form of participation.

The Definition of Slavery: She asked if a woman is merely an object to be staked, or if her identity is independent of her husband’s fortune.


Application in Modern Times

In India there was a family health survey which was conducted for married women from the age group 18-49 years.

The report stated that 22% of women live with toxic husbands.

Definition for Toxic husbands:

  • Doubt their wife.
  • Paying attention to make sure women don't deal with money
  • Trust deficit to give them any money
  • Making friends with their home members and themselves
  • Dislike them to speak to even female friends
  • Physical violence
Women without education and not knowing how to defend/protest/oppose/object/resist themselves were known to be 3 times more at the receiving end of their toxic husbands.

The report stated the following solutions.

    1. Education
    2. Protest, oppose, object like Draupadi if your rights are compromised.

The report clearly demonstrates that a woman not knowing how to defend or protest for her rights and keeping silent is bound to be at the receiving end of the spectrum. Here remember Draupadi shows the way, she did not remain silent in the Sabha of Kings (Dhritarashtra) , learned men and Guru's (Bhishma, Vidhura, Dronacharya) and her husband's (Yudhishthir, Bhima, Arjuna etc).

 

Remember Draupadi was not a victim, she would have, had she remained silent and she not only got her self-respect but also freed her husband’s from a boon offered later by Dhritarashtra.

 

Also, an attribute of Draupadi was Unshakable Devotion or Bhakti

It is said that she surrendered to Lord Krishna after seeking help unsuccessfully from her husband's and the elderly men in the court when she was being disrobed, who restored her self-confidence but it was she who fought for her rights, dignity and self-respect.

Dharma

What is freedom?

 As per the Mahabharata anybody who follows Dharma is free.

 Dharma is divided into three categories.

 

1. Universal Dharma (Moral-Side/General/Ethics’): What is ahitam (harmful/unfavourable) to you, don't do to others. (Even many western thinkers like STOICS says that we don't have the freedom to control others, we can only control our thoughts and actions)

 

2. Sva-Dharmam: (Bhagavat Gita)

  • What if you are unable to manifest/express/revel from inside you, will destroy you, is your Sva-Dharmam
  • What you are unable to bring out from within and would make you, subservient, sorrowful and dependent (lack of freedom)
  • Also, to bring out, what is not within you, will also result in sorrow. (para-dharma)

3. Moksham: Absolute freedom for a person (Mahatmas, Sages)

 

As per the Mahabharata anybody following Dharma and Sva-Dharma are considered to be free.

 

Eg of Sva-Dharma: If Sachin Tendulkar/Lata Mangeshkar was not a batsmen or singer then he/she would perennially be in a dependent/unhappy state, not in a state of freedom. Or if you make Sachin Tendulkar to sing and Lata Mangeshkar to play cricket, the result would also have been distinct.


P.S. The above article has been inspired from the Amritapuri Dialogues on Mahabharata 



Tuesday, 14 October 2025

Ashoka The Great , Really?

Wherever there is Krishna, the master of all mystics, and wherever there is Arjuna, the supreme archer, there will also certainly be opulence, victory, extraordinary power and morality - Bhagavad-gita 18.78




Ashoka has been described as one of the greatest emperors of India. He is credited with unifying India.

He is praised in all our history textbooks for leaving violence and accepting non-violence. He left the kalinga war, accepted buddhism and became a buddhist.

Question: Is Ashoka really the great?

In the Bhagvat Gita Arjuna develops  “vishadam” (depression) and questions himself if he is doing right in killing his relatives on the other side. So he says , I will not fight and drops his bow.

He says he will be happy taking sanyasa than fighting the Mahabharata war.

If sanyasa was great,why did Lord Krishna not ask him to accept the sanyasa (non-violence) and prevent the war?

Instead Lord Krishna says pick up your bow and fight ,Arjuna you are a warrier, your “Sva -Dharma “ is to fight not take Sanyasa. If you win you will get to rule your kingdom (Rajashree), if you lose you will be given a befitting farewell (veergati,veeraswargam) as a kstriya at your death. But do not run away from the fight. You should not follow somebody else’s dharma “Para Dharma” that will only bring disrepute to your name. It is better to die in the war than to take up sanyasa.

I believe India’s doom started in the 11th century when Ashoka followed  “ Para Dharma “ or somebody else’s dharma . His dharma or sva-dharma was to fight and protect his subjects not leave the battle,when a person takes up somebody else’s dharma, he is doomed is well stated in the below verse in the  bhagvat gita..

श्रेयान् स्वधर्मो विगुणः परधर्मात् स्वनुष्ठितात्।
स्वधर्मे निधनं श्रेयः परधर्मो
भयावहः॥ - Bhagvat Gita 3.35 

“It is far better to perform one’s own duty (dharma), even though imperfectly, than to perform another’s duty perfectly. Death in the course of performing one’s own dharma is better; the dharma of another brings fear and danger.”

Sadly Lord Krishna was not there for Ashoka.

I believe one should act  according to one’s dharma (Swabhava (latent tendences),Smaskaram) .Then victory/hapiness is destined.

In the end Krishna says to Arjuna after having listened to him , you are free to choose your way. There was no fear or compulsion to listen to the lord , Arjuna had a free will to either follow the path said by Krishna or to reject it.

Practically how does Bhagvat Gita  be used in our daily lifes:

It is stated that spirituality is for the people who have lost hope in life, no Arjuna was a person who had enough material wealth as well as victories and precise goal throughout his  life, so spirituality is for all who desire victory and for the materialists to live a happy life.

Though remember spirituality is not escapism from life. Infact it is handling the sucess/failures in life with an equanimous mind.

There are very stages that the person is afraid of the ‘result’ whether he would succed or fail (in exams ,business,marriage,elections,interviews etc).Krishna says do your work according to dharma,irrespective of the result,whatever the result, hold it with equanimity.

सुखदुःखे समे कृत्वा लाभालाभौ जयाजयौ।
ततो युद्धाय युज्यस्व नैवं पापमवाप्स्यसि॥ -Bhagvat Gita -2.38

"Having made pleasure and pain, gain and loss, victory and defeat the same —
engage in battle (do your duty) with equanimity;
thus, you will not incur sin."

Mind you Arjuna was not afraid of the strength of his opponents in the battlefield, but was depressed due to the fact that he would have to kill his blood relatives for getting the kingdom, so he said I don’t want the kingdom and would go sannyasa. Everybody would feel that he is doing such a great service by not shedding blood and taking a path of non-violence ,everybody would praise him ,but not Krishna. Krishna told 

अशोच्यानन्वशोचस्त्वं प्रज्ञावादांश्च भाषसे।
गतासूनगतासूंश्च नानुशोचन्ति पण्डिताः॥ -Bhagvat Gita - 2.11

"You speak words of wisdom, yet you grieve for those who should not be grieved for.
The truly wise do not lament for the living or the dead."

A warrier is born to fight, both inward and outward.If you don’t fight here , the battle will follow you. Don’t take the fight from your known kuruskshetra to unknown kuruskshetra’s.


PS: The above blog post has been written based on my understanding of the Bhagvad Gita and Shri L Girish Kumar video given below.

How to practise Bhagvat Gita in Daily life